![]() 2719 in conflict with section 3 (a) of the Act. The lower court erred in not holding section 15 of Act No. 2719 unenforceable as being in direct conflict with section 3 (p) of the Act of Congress, approved Aug(Jones Law). The demurrer was sustained, and the plaintiff, refusing to amend, judgment was entered for the defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals, assigning the following errors: jgc: The defendant demurred to each cause of action on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. 2719, demanded of the plaintiff a tax of P2,000 per annum for the years 19, "because the plaintiff owned the 227.67 hectares of coal land described in paragraph two above." That on February 15, 1923, plaintiff paid the tax under written protest, and demanded a return of the money, which the defendant refused to do.Īs a second cause of action, the plaintiff makes like allegations for the year 1923, and for a third cause of action, makes like allegations for the year 1924, and prays for judgment in its favor and against the defendant for the sum of P6,000, with interest and costs. That on January 9, 1923, the defendant, claiming to act under section 15 of Act No. 264, in the land records of the City of Manila." cralaw virtua1aw library Province of Cebu, Philippine Islands, as is evidenced by original certificate of title No. That the plaintiff is the registered owner of 227.67 hectares of coal land, located in the municipality of Danao. That the defendant is the duly appointed, qualified and acting Collector of Internal Revenue of the Philippine Islands, with his principal office in the City of Manila. In its first cause of action, plaintiff alleges that it is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Philippine Islands, with its principal office and place of business in the municipality and Province of Cebu. Where the actual title to coal land has passed from and out of the Government, and is registered in a private owner, he is not subject to the payment of the "annual tax" "on each block or tract of 400 hectares or fraction thereof," as specified and defined in and by the provisions of section 15 of Act No. WHERE THE ACTUAL TITLE HAS PASSED FROM AND OUT OF THE GOVERNMENT, THE OWNER OF THE LAND IS EXEMPT FROM THE "ANNUAL TAX" DEFINED IN SECTION 15 OF ACT No. As all orders must be signed for at delivery we will call you to confirm your shipping address.1. Thank you for ordering with Mining Syndicate. Also.don't forget to HODL! Please feel free to email us and we would love to answer any questions you may have. Give us a call and talk to a real, live, American human about any mining needs you may have. All of our operations and sales staff are here in the US of A and we stand behind our miners. ![]() Headquartered and operating out of Dallas, TX, we take pride in provide at-home miners with the equipment they need to help secure the Bitcoin network. ![]() Mining Syndicate enables Bitcoin mining for the little guy. We value trust and transparency above all else. Otherwise, what is the point of decentralization? What's mined is yours. We don't believe Satoshi envisioned mining being owned by corporations of nation states, but by individuals. We want miners in the hands of individuals around the world. Our mission statement is to strengthen the Bitcoin network by enabling small-scale miners to affordably purchase and reliably host miners. Mining Syndicate has been involved in the crypto space since 2016. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |